The Egmont Pact covered agreements on a number of issues: in less than 25 years, the Egmont Group has moved from a bilateral agreement between the Financial Intelligence Units (FIU) to a truly global organization between the Financial Intelligence Units (FIU) of two jurisdictions. 2. Depending on the nature of the competent authority and the nature and purpose of cooperation, different channels can be adapted to the exchange of information. Examples of mechanisms or channels used for the exchange of information are bilateral or multilateral agreements or agreements, declarations of intent, reciprocal exchanges or appropriate international or regional organizations. However, this recommendation is not intended to cover cooperation in mutual legal aid or extradition. The pact was completed the same year by the Stuyvenberg agreement. Both would be the « Community Pact. » Egmont members agreed to promote as a priority the exchange of information on the basis of reciprocity or mutual agreement and the development of appropriate modalities for this purpose. The agreement was not put into practice due to immediate protests. In particular, the points relating to Brussels, with the end of institutional equality between the French and Dutch spokesmen, were unacceptable to many Flemish. The Egmont Pact (Dutch: Egmontpact); in French: Egmont Pact; In German, the 1977 Egmont Pact is an agreement on the reform of Belgium into a federal state and on relations between the country`s linguistic communities. [1] The pact was not implemented because of the resignation of the government, but important elements of the pact were used in subsequent reforms of the Belgian state. Following an agreement on a definition of the « financial intelligence » unit, it conducted an investigation into the possibilities and modalities of information exchange, developed an information exchange model, set up a secure website to facilitate the exchange of information, and implemented several specific initiatives to develop the expertise and capabilities of FRC staff and contribute to the successful examination of issues within the competence of FRCs; 1.
States parties cooperate to prevent Article 2 offences, by taking all practical measures, including adapting their national legislation, to prevent and counter, if necessary, preparations in their respective territories for committing these offences, both inside and outside their territory, including: the Egmont crisis took place , subsequently, for some Belgian parts. The far-right wing of the Volksunie separated, which led to the creation of the far-right Vlaams Blok party. One of the last single parties in Belgium, the Socialist BSP-PSB, was divided into a French-speaking party and a Dutch-speaking party. The last remaining single party is still the PVDA-PTB. . . . Convinced that there is both considerable potential for large-scale international cooperation between financial statements and the need to strengthen such cooperation and to ensure that effective international cooperation between Member States and between Member States must be based on mutual trust; Countries should ensure that their competent authorities offer the widest possible range of international cooperation to their foreign partners.